When it comes to protecting our civil liberties, it can be tough to navigate the balance between safety and freedom. Unarmed and armed security are two approaches to this debate that bring drastically different implications.
Unarmed security provides an additional layer of assurance that citizens’ civil liberties will remain intact. This type of security is usually non-threatening and non-intrusive. They serve as a visible presence to dissuade criminal activity, and can help provide a sense of peace of mind for citizens. In addition, unarmed security does not require a license, and can be employed by organizations to provide a safe and secure environment.
Armed security, on the other hand, can be intimidating and can have a tremendous effect on civil liberties. On one hand, it provides an added degree of protection, as armed security can be used to intervene in any situation that poses a threat to public safety. On the other hand, the presence of armed security can be seen as a violation of civil rights, as it can potentially lead to excessive force and intimidation.
The impact of unarmed and armed security on civil liberties is one that should be closely examined. It is important to consider the consequences of both types of security and
#securityguards #security #securityguardservices #securityofficers #aoesecurity
